A better NSManagedObjectContext​.performAndWait

The DispatchQueue.sync method has this nice property that it automatically returns whatever value you return from the dispatched block. This allows you to write something like the following:

let v = queue.sync {
    return ... // computation that has to be run on queue

This is much more elegant than having to declare an optional result variable before the call to sync, capturing and assigning to the variable inside the closure, and finally force-unwrapping the value after sync has returned.


I’d like to have the same convenience for Core Data, where NSManaged​Object​Context​.perform​Block​And​Wait(_:) plays a similar role as DispatchQueue.sync. Core Data doesn’t ship with a suitable overload of performAndWait, but we can provide our own in an extension:

extension NSManagedObjectContext {
    func performAndWait<T>(_ block: () -> T) -> T {
        var result: T? = nil
        // Call the framework version
        performAndWait {
            result = block()
        return result!

I chose to keep the original name, but in contrast to the existing performAndWait the new method is generic over a type parameter T — the return type of the block argument and the method itself. The implementation wraps a call to the framework version of the method with the boilerplate to handle the return value.

In my limited testing, the type checker had no trouble disambiguating between the two performAndWait overloads — it automatically chose the correct overload based on the expected return types. If you are worried about ambiguity errors, feel free to give the new method a different name.

Error handling with rethrows

DispatchQueue.sync has another nice feature. Notice the rethrows keyword in the method signature:

func sync<T>(execute work: () throws -> T) rethrows -> T

A rethrowing function indicates that it can only throw an error if one of its function parameters throws an error. This enables two things:

  1. It allows the caller to pass in a throwing function (or call throwing functions in the closure expression).

  2. It gives the type checker granular control over the enforcement of the try keyword. Callers of DispatchQueue.sync only have to use try if the passed-in function is throwing.

Replicating rethrows for performAndWait isn’t trivial. We’d have to catch any error inside the inner closure and pass it to the outer scope in a similar fashion as we do for the return value. If we do this though, the compiler can no longer prove the only-throws-when-function-argument-throws invariant and therefore rejects the code.

Brent Royal-Gordon just pitched to Swift Evolution to introduce a way for developers to opt out of the strict compiler checks for rethrows, analogous to what we already have for escaping closures.

Outsmarting the type checker

In his post, Brent also mentions how the Dispatch framework solves this issue:

It is possible to work around this by exploiting certain bugs in the rethrows checking—the Dispatch overlay does this to add error handling to DispatchQueue.sync(execute:).

We can use the same trick for our problem. Check out the relevant code in the Swift repository. And here’s the verbatim copy of the code (I only changed the function names) for performAndWait:

extension NSManagedObjectContext {
    func performAndWait<T>(_ block: () throws -> T) rethrows -> T {
        return try _performAndWaitHelper(
            fn: performAndWait, execute: block, rescue: { throw $0 }

    /// Helper function for convincing the type checker that
    /// the rethrows invariant holds for performAndWait.
    /// Source: https://github.com/apple/swift/blob/bb157a070ec6534e4b534456d208b03adc07704b/stdlib/public/SDK/Dispatch/Queue.swift#L228-L249
    private func _performAndWaitHelper<T>(
        fn: (() -> Void) -> Void,
        execute work: () throws -> T,
        rescue: ((Error) throws -> (T))) rethrows -> T
        var result: T?
        var error: Error?
        withoutActuallyEscaping(work) { _work in
            fn {
                do {
                    result = try _work()
                } catch let e {
                    error = e
        if let e = error {
            return try rescue(e)
        } else {
            return result!

performAndWait now calls through to a private helper function that takes two throwing functions (the original block and an error handler) and this convinces the compiler that the rethrows invariant holds.


Here’s how you’d retrieve the number of records from a fetch request:

let context: NSManagedObjectContext = ...
let fetchRequest: NSFetchRequest = ...
let count = try context.performAndWait {
    return try context.count(for: fetchRequest)

Another nice improvement to performAndWait would be to have it pass the managed object context to the worker block, as Michael Tsai does in his solution.

If you liked this article, I bet you’ll also like Advanced Swift, the book I wrote together with Chris Eidhof and Airspeed Velocity.

The third edition has been fully updated for Swift 4.

Advanced Swift is available as a DRM-free e-book (including Xcode playgrounds) and in print.